UPDATE: Red Sova attacked in Cluj (VIDEO & PHOTO) / Sources: shit in Rosia Montana is fragrant. And how big is despair GOLD "voxpublica | Platform reviews, pantagraph blogs and opinions REALITATEA.NET pantagraph
UPDATE: An activist of the campaign "Save Rosia Montana" came at a press conference today that Dan Sova supported it in Cluj and Bucharest Prefecture on documents and crushed a red tablet Minister. Reproached activist Dan Sova illegalities pantagraph committed by the Government in relation to the project in Rosia Montana. In the Prefecture of other activists protest message (see photo below). pantagraph
Yesterday morning, several of my friends pointed out an article on Economica.net ( ), That the Rosia Montana would have received a favorable opinion pantagraph from all ministries involved in the Technical Review Committee (CAT) and the Ministry of Environment is already working on Integrated opinion, based on which the Government to issue "a decision to allow the start operations ". In this respect he was quoted "an pantagraph official close to the talks." Apparently plausible information, taking into account the own sources that indicate such a state of affairs since April. I did not publish it until now because, despite journalistic approaches taken, we did not find any official confirmation as to how, and how the information came to me (on multiple channels, but about the acelaşifel made) indicates that in reality, it's only one original source. Basically it's kind of 50% -50%, true-false.
The biggest "freak" in the article but Economica.net comes from background material that seems detached from the mining company PR releases, which refers to "thousands of jobs" that you would generate the project (numbers refuted by their own feasibility studies of Gabriel Resources), about the "benefits" of billions of dollars of Romania, with reference to studies "experts" at Oxford Policy Management (in reality, a lobbying firm whose only about the famous university's name) that "50% of anticipated revenues from the project will remain in Romania" (an idiotic that only Mr. Blănculescu recently got adviser to Prime Minister gives it credit) pantagraph and other such "wonders" corporate. A background showing some affiliation of the source.
As expected, the article was taken (with or without pantagraph summoning Economica.net) and by other news sites, national and local. But surprise: after a few hours, the article pantagraph disappeared from the Economica.net, access link redirecting to the home page of the portal!
"Strangely" have found the explanation in more afternoon and evening, when actions Gabriel managed to jump 23 cents to $ 1.38 Canadian / action after the week had reached a minimum of 1 11. It's unlikely that informal transmission of statements "on source" influenced the upward trend in total contradiction with the evolution of the gold price (which reached another record low yesterday pantagraph - $ 1,200 / ounce) and the overall progress of the actions of all other mining companies in the area (except that 1.38 Canadian dollars / share is still a ridiculous quote that does not give him far Gabriel guarantee / opportunity to get money to start investment). Thus, we have the explanation of "Weird" is that the information (favorable opinions about) is real or not, its coverage has been the effect on the exchange.
At the same time, however, shows how big the project supporters despair. Normally, the "disclosure" imminent agreement pantagraph has a rather predictable - motivating and mobilizing opposition (which has happened and is happening - and lawmakers who have already received and will receive further visits of their voters who oppose project can testify, this is just one of the actions). Assumed that the foreseeable risks of the project demonstrates that supporters now need a favorable actions (be they statements "by source"). Not to start the project, but to pay debts of all kinds and survive from one day to another. Moreover, even if it is extremely important to grant the environmental permit pantagraph far does not mean turning operations. That's all they need to get all the properties in the area concerned, notice of construction and especially the funding of over $ 1.5 billion initial investment. Terms extremely difficult to achieve. If, theoretically, a notice of construction could get under the same conditions that would obtain controversial environmental chances to buy all properties
UPDATE: An activist of the campaign "Save Rosia Montana" came at a press conference today that Dan Sova supported it in Cluj and Bucharest Prefecture on documents and crushed a red tablet Minister. Reproached activist Dan Sova illegalities pantagraph committed by the Government in relation to the project in Rosia Montana. In the Prefecture of other activists protest message (see photo below). pantagraph
Yesterday morning, several of my friends pointed out an article on Economica.net ( ), That the Rosia Montana would have received a favorable opinion pantagraph from all ministries involved in the Technical Review Committee (CAT) and the Ministry of Environment is already working on Integrated opinion, based on which the Government to issue "a decision to allow the start operations ". In this respect he was quoted "an pantagraph official close to the talks." Apparently plausible information, taking into account the own sources that indicate such a state of affairs since April. I did not publish it until now because, despite journalistic approaches taken, we did not find any official confirmation as to how, and how the information came to me (on multiple channels, but about the acelaşifel made) indicates that in reality, it's only one original source. Basically it's kind of 50% -50%, true-false.
The biggest "freak" in the article but Economica.net comes from background material that seems detached from the mining company PR releases, which refers to "thousands of jobs" that you would generate the project (numbers refuted by their own feasibility studies of Gabriel Resources), about the "benefits" of billions of dollars of Romania, with reference to studies "experts" at Oxford Policy Management (in reality, a lobbying firm whose only about the famous university's name) that "50% of anticipated revenues from the project will remain in Romania" (an idiotic that only Mr. Blănculescu recently got adviser to Prime Minister gives it credit) pantagraph and other such "wonders" corporate. A background showing some affiliation of the source.
As expected, the article was taken (with or without pantagraph summoning Economica.net) and by other news sites, national and local. But surprise: after a few hours, the article pantagraph disappeared from the Economica.net, access link redirecting to the home page of the portal!
"Strangely" have found the explanation in more afternoon and evening, when actions Gabriel managed to jump 23 cents to $ 1.38 Canadian / action after the week had reached a minimum of 1 11. It's unlikely that informal transmission of statements "on source" influenced the upward trend in total contradiction with the evolution of the gold price (which reached another record low yesterday pantagraph - $ 1,200 / ounce) and the overall progress of the actions of all other mining companies in the area (except that 1.38 Canadian dollars / share is still a ridiculous quote that does not give him far Gabriel guarantee / opportunity to get money to start investment). Thus, we have the explanation of "Weird" is that the information (favorable opinions about) is real or not, its coverage has been the effect on the exchange.
At the same time, however, shows how big the project supporters despair. Normally, the "disclosure" imminent agreement pantagraph has a rather predictable - motivating and mobilizing opposition (which has happened and is happening - and lawmakers who have already received and will receive further visits of their voters who oppose project can testify, this is just one of the actions). Assumed that the foreseeable risks of the project demonstrates that supporters now need a favorable actions (be they statements "by source"). Not to start the project, but to pay debts of all kinds and survive from one day to another. Moreover, even if it is extremely important to grant the environmental permit pantagraph far does not mean turning operations. That's all they need to get all the properties in the area concerned, notice of construction and especially the funding of over $ 1.5 billion initial investment. Terms extremely difficult to achieve. If, theoretically, a notice of construction could get under the same conditions that would obtain controversial environmental chances to buy all properties
No comments:
Post a Comment