One of These Days ... Do not bad One of These Days ...
I was shocked when I heard last week that YouTube is celebrating five years of existence, the Internet sod! I was surprised because I remember, before YouTube, where I found videos of cats singing a few girls doing an imitation of Beyoncé or ataispeáint a scene from Return of the Jedi, frame for frame, made with Lego. It is true to say that those are filled every void!
Google bought the young web application in October 2006. They paid $ 1.65 billion for the company. Video featured the founders, Chad Hurley and Steve Chen, are announcing the YouTube community this news. Nicolas Carr published "The Big Switch" in 2008, books by competition between growth history of electricity and the Internet. As part of the discussion there, ippicy describes the video of Chad this is Steve. Badger in Carr's ippicy words when he writes about how Chad gives "kings" of YouTube is Google. According to Carr, such as no king, Chad should be is a more umhaile Steve since they had "ndaorchlann" put the crowns on their heads blessed. Without YouTube community, (with whom they are thanking in this video, in fact), there would be no YouTube. The problem with this car is the lack of understanding, according to him, showing ippicy the young kings of the relationship between a community YouTube. Hate is that these two are laughing about $ 1.65 billion to acquire because of the creative work of others.
Maybe he has a point. He was not only concerned about the marriage and the dowry that went with it. Video rights owners were worried because Google fadseasta want all the world's information available to everyone for free. How they would ensure that they receive the correct payment subject to the same rights? The individual, or mhargaitheoir bhfógraitheoir or rising star, might seem, but your music companies, film and television, it was a major difficulty. Copyright lasts until today question with no correct solution, or in fact, civil solution. Of course not only YouTube or bhuanaigh ippicy created the problem but, with the priority given by Google for videos in the results of search, a small internet browser is not used YouTube. ippicy Everyone ippicy is Ready strip of Others
A way that one of the reasons that I consider points by Nicholas Carr. Technology has created a culture that is damaging us all money in my opinion. Culture that expects everything for free but with ads taking everything under the sky. The internet came step by step from research projects going west to the middle of the 20th century. There was passion, pride and academic fiosrachas associated with the work generated by the internet as other technologies. In the book 'outliers' by Malcolm Gladwell, he examines the like 10,000 times must be submitted in any trade to find the expertise, be it on the guitar, the piano or his one example, computer recording. In his example, describes the amount of time young Bill Gates spent working on a computer. As a hobby, at night, or Friday afternoon. Did I mention that there is a prize to whoever comes up with the Irish word "nerd" to me?
The university ippicy project created Google Sergey Brin Larry Page is part of the doctoral phase. I do not think they were thinking of aspects like 'PAID search' when they threw the candles NAPS feast in Stanford. Both were passionate about their subject, but they did not expect their work to generate one of the most important companies in the 20th century. These technologies facilitate the dissemination of the material but it is unclear to create a more just world where the wealth is earned divided all the wealth created by the same. Declined era of Privacy
YouTube attracted to light on privacy issues ippicy also, like all Network ippicy 2.0 technology, social aspects associated with YouTube. Network can prove it, write a comment under the video and subscribe to specific users. Make sure that Google is collecting all of this information. The advantage is that you will see new videos like the current favorite topic. The disadvantage is you do not know the terms remain the same conditions as always. But for the digital natives, are ready to share their personal wishes and preferences with them to get a grip on the most innovative offering.
But with video, Privacy is another kind of question. Raising the vision although this video? Of the person or of the person who pulled the video? One case is very famous on YouTube and mentioned the author Daniel J SOLOVE his book 'The Future of Reputation: Gossip, RUMO
I was shocked when I heard last week that YouTube is celebrating five years of existence, the Internet sod! I was surprised because I remember, before YouTube, where I found videos of cats singing a few girls doing an imitation of Beyoncé or ataispeáint a scene from Return of the Jedi, frame for frame, made with Lego. It is true to say that those are filled every void!
Google bought the young web application in October 2006. They paid $ 1.65 billion for the company. Video featured the founders, Chad Hurley and Steve Chen, are announcing the YouTube community this news. Nicolas Carr published "The Big Switch" in 2008, books by competition between growth history of electricity and the Internet. As part of the discussion there, ippicy describes the video of Chad this is Steve. Badger in Carr's ippicy words when he writes about how Chad gives "kings" of YouTube is Google. According to Carr, such as no king, Chad should be is a more umhaile Steve since they had "ndaorchlann" put the crowns on their heads blessed. Without YouTube community, (with whom they are thanking in this video, in fact), there would be no YouTube. The problem with this car is the lack of understanding, according to him, showing ippicy the young kings of the relationship between a community YouTube. Hate is that these two are laughing about $ 1.65 billion to acquire because of the creative work of others.
Maybe he has a point. He was not only concerned about the marriage and the dowry that went with it. Video rights owners were worried because Google fadseasta want all the world's information available to everyone for free. How they would ensure that they receive the correct payment subject to the same rights? The individual, or mhargaitheoir bhfógraitheoir or rising star, might seem, but your music companies, film and television, it was a major difficulty. Copyright lasts until today question with no correct solution, or in fact, civil solution. Of course not only YouTube or bhuanaigh ippicy created the problem but, with the priority given by Google for videos in the results of search, a small internet browser is not used YouTube. ippicy Everyone ippicy is Ready strip of Others
A way that one of the reasons that I consider points by Nicholas Carr. Technology has created a culture that is damaging us all money in my opinion. Culture that expects everything for free but with ads taking everything under the sky. The internet came step by step from research projects going west to the middle of the 20th century. There was passion, pride and academic fiosrachas associated with the work generated by the internet as other technologies. In the book 'outliers' by Malcolm Gladwell, he examines the like 10,000 times must be submitted in any trade to find the expertise, be it on the guitar, the piano or his one example, computer recording. In his example, describes the amount of time young Bill Gates spent working on a computer. As a hobby, at night, or Friday afternoon. Did I mention that there is a prize to whoever comes up with the Irish word "nerd" to me?
The university ippicy project created Google Sergey Brin Larry Page is part of the doctoral phase. I do not think they were thinking of aspects like 'PAID search' when they threw the candles NAPS feast in Stanford. Both were passionate about their subject, but they did not expect their work to generate one of the most important companies in the 20th century. These technologies facilitate the dissemination of the material but it is unclear to create a more just world where the wealth is earned divided all the wealth created by the same. Declined era of Privacy
YouTube attracted to light on privacy issues ippicy also, like all Network ippicy 2.0 technology, social aspects associated with YouTube. Network can prove it, write a comment under the video and subscribe to specific users. Make sure that Google is collecting all of this information. The advantage is that you will see new videos like the current favorite topic. The disadvantage is you do not know the terms remain the same conditions as always. But for the digital natives, are ready to share their personal wishes and preferences with them to get a grip on the most innovative offering.
But with video, Privacy is another kind of question. Raising the vision although this video? Of the person or of the person who pulled the video? One case is very famous on YouTube and mentioned the author Daniel J SOLOVE his book 'The Future of Reputation: Gossip, RUMO
No comments:
Post a Comment